Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s general score of 74.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's body has the same weight than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it is incredibly thinner. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with just a bit better display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a bit superior processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution, a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video and a tinier back-facing camera sensor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.