Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is a bit better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a 79.5 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G body is a lot newer and much thinner, but a little heavier than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has an external SD slot that allows up to 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a bit faster processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a much longer battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it has a camera with a way lower 21 megapixels resolution, a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a tinier aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.