Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a global score of 82.4, which is better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro body is incredibly newer and way thinner, but a little bit heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores and 3 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a really longer battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67 percent more battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a superior camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger camera aperture and a camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.