Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has an overall score of 75.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro body is newer and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, although it is a bit heavier. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a quite worse display density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photos, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.