Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having an 80.3 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 body is way newer and extremely thinner, but just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and 1 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with improved battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 captures much better photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations, higher 120 fps video frame rates, a much better resolution back facing camera and a larger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.