Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a general score of 76.6, which is just a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s overall score of 74.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's body is way newer and extremely thinner, but heavier than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a larger number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little bit better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 have very similar storage capacity for apps and games, both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB and exactly the same 64 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.