Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with a score of 80.2 against 74.1. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a much newer cellphone, and it is also a bit lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a little sharper display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.