Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10s Pro is just a bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a general score of 76.6 against 74.1. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also a little bit lighter and notably thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features improved battery performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) takes a little bit better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality photos, a camera with a lot worse 21 mega-pixels resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.