Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a overall score of 80.7 against 73.8. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction is noticeably newer and a lot thinner, but just a little heavier than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit smaller screen.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL features a quite superior performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and more RAM.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution camera.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.