Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-07-28 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 73.8 overall score. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has Android 5.1. LG G7 ThinQ's body is a lot newer, just a little bit lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015).
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a quite greater count of pixels per display inch. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a faster processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG G7 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ has a battery lifetime that's just as good as the battery life in Moto X Pure Edition (2015).
LG G7 ThinQ features a camera that's very similar to Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s camera, because although the LG G7 ThinQ has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels, a worse (4K) video resolution and a much smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light images and video.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.