Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-07-28 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has an overall score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 73.8 overall score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's body is notably newer and incredibly thinner than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, but it is a bit heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has 11 version and Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has Android 5.1 version, giving you a couple additional features.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixels amount per screen inch. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a better processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more RAM and more cores. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, a way lower 21 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a tinier aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a much better battery life than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 67% more battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.