Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 has a score of 88.7, which is much better than Moto X Style's general score of 74.1. IPhone 12's construction is extremely newer, a bit lighter and way thinner than Moto X Style. The iPhone 12 features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have 6 cpu cores, the iPhone 12 also has a 64-bit processor and more RAM.
The Apple iPhone 12 features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1170 x 2532px, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Motorola Moto X Style takes slightly better pictures and videos than iPhone 12, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 21 MP resolution.
Motorola Moto X Style has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. Moto X Style has a little longer battery performance than iPhone 12, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.