Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 14.x |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 mini is better than Motorola Moto X Style, getting an 88.5 score against 74.1. IPhone 12 mini's design is incredibly newer, notably lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto X Style. The iPhone 12 mini counts with a more vivid screen than Moto X Style, although it has a just a bit lower display density, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen.
The Motorola Moto X Style features a superior storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 128 GB. IPhone 12 mini counts with a much better performance than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same number of cores, the iPhone 12 mini also has a 64-bits processor and 1 GB more RAM.
The Moto X Style counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and video in low light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto X Style features improved battery life than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.