Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2015-09-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3279mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 is way better than the Motorola Moto X Style, with a score of 92.5 against 74.1. The iPhone 14 body is much newer, way thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto X Style. The iPhone 14 features a lot better processing power than Moto X Style, and although they both have a Hexa-Core processor, the iPhone 14 also has a greater amount of RAM and a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 14 counts with a brighter screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Moto X Style takes clearer photos and videos than iPhone 14, because although it has worse video frame rates and a lot smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto X Style also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Apple iPhone 14 has a slightly better storage to install games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone 14 features a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 3279mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.