Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2015-09-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro is way better than Moto X Style, having a 95.6 score against 74.1. Although the iPhone 14 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Moto X Style, it's thinner and also much newer. Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a sharper display than Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1179 x 2556px and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
IPhone 14 Pro features a much better processing power than Moto X Style, and although they both have 6 CPU cores, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM and a 64-bits processor. Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The iPhone 14 Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, better video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.