Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2015-09-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro Max is a lot better than the Motorola Moto X Style, getting a overall score of 94.9 against 74.1. Although the iPhone 14 Pro Max is incredibly heavier than the Motorola Moto X Style, it's noticeably thinner and also newer. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit worse 1290 x 2796 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a little bit better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have 6 cores, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a way better battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has 4323mAh of battery capacity. IPhone 14 Pro Max captures just a bit better videos and photos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, faster video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.