Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) is much better than the Motorola Moto X Style, with a general score of 81.5 against 74.1. The iPhone SE (2020) design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto X Style. IPhone SE (2020) features a quite better processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM and a Hexa-Core processor, the iPhone SE (2020) also has a 64-bits processor.
The Moto X Style counts with a little more vivid display than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, a bigger display and a lot greater pixels density. The Moto X Style counts with a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto X Style also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Moto X Style features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto X Style also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB. The Motorola Moto X Style has a superior battery duration than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.