Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is better than the Motorola Moto X Style, with an 82 score against 74.1. Even though the Apple iPhone XR is just a little heavier than Motorola Moto X Style, it's noticeably thinner and notably newer. The iPhone XR features a quite better performance than Moto X Style, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores, the iPhone XR also has a 64-bit processing unit.
Moto X Style has a little sharper screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixel number per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Moto X Style counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto X Style has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto X Style also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. IPhone XR has a battery lifetime that's just as good as Motorola Moto X Style's battery lifetime, although the iPhone XR has just 2942mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.