Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X Style, with a 77.1 score against 74.1. Even though Asus ROG Phone is heavier than Motorola Moto X Style, it's extremely thinner and notably newer. The Asus ROG Phone features a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a bit lower screen pixels density and a lot worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Asus ROG Phone features a quite better performance than Moto X Style, because it has 2 more cores and 5 GB more RAM. Asus ROG Phone has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Asus ROG Phone features better battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. The Moto X Style features a greater camera than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.