Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black glare |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 is much better than Moto X Style, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 74.1. Although Asus ROG Phone 3 is notably heavier than the Moto X Style, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a better performance than Moto X Style, because it has 2 more cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 captures greater pictures and videos than Moto X Style, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a way better video resolution, a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.