Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is a little bit better than the Moto X Style, having a general score of 81.1 against 74.1. Google Nexus 6's design is just a little thinner than the Moto X Style, but it's a little bit heavier and was released about 11 months before. Google Nexus 6 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with an extra GPU.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a bit better screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Motorola Moto X Style features a superior memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto X Style also has an external SD slot that supports up to 128 GB.
The Motorola Moto X Style takes a little bit better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The Google Nexus 6 has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3220mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.