Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Style's score of 74.1. The Google Pixel is a newer device, and it's also extremely lighter and much thinner than Moto X Style. Moto X Style features a bit better display than Google Pixel, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a just a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch.
Google Pixel has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel has a bit more storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Moto X Style counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto X Style also counts with a lot higher 21 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto X Style features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.