Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than Moto X Style, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 74.1. Google Pixel 3 XL's body is notably newer and way thinner, but just a bit heavier than Moto X Style. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto X Style, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the display, a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Motorola Moto X Style features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little faster processor than Moto X Style, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a little better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Moto X Style has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto X Style also counts with a camera with a lot higher 21 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.