Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than the Moto X Style, having a general score of 81.9 against 74.1. Google Pixel 4's design is noticeably newer, a little lighter and way thinner than the Moto X Style. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Moto X Style features a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Moto X Style also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite higher pixels density. Motorola Moto X Style features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and a much higher 21 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Moto X Style counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto X Style also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 128 GB. Motorola Moto X Style counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.