Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the Moto X Style, with a score of 82.9 against 74.1. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit heavier than Moto X Style, it's thinner and also newer. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better display than Moto X Style, because it has a slightly higher 1440 x 3040 resolution, a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite larger display.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit faster CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of faster cores and more RAM memory. Moto X Style features much more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto X Style also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB.
The Motorola Moto X Style shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a lot higher 21 mega-pixels resolution camera and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Google Pixel 4 XL features superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 23 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.