Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than Moto X Style, getting an 82.9 score against 74.1. The Google Pixel 4a is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also notably lighter and notably thinner than the Moto X Style. Moto X Style features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a bit greater pixel amount per inch in the display.
Google Pixel 4a has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Moto X Style features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 5 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.