Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than Motorola Moto X Style, with an 89 score against 74.1. Google Pixel 5's design is newer, lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 2 more cpu cores.
Motorola Moto X Style counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a little better pixels density. Motorola Moto X Style shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a much better 21 MP resolution camera in the back and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Google Pixel 5 has a really longer battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.