Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is way better than the Moto X Style's general score of 74.1. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's construction is a lot newer and a lot thinner, but also extremely heavier than Moto X Style. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a better performing CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better looking display than Moto X Style, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1280 x 2800 and a bit lower pixels number per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a better camera than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has faster video frame rates, a much larger camera aperture, a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much longer battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 5600mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.