Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Moto X Style's global score of 74.1. The HTC U Ultra construction is newer, just a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner than Moto X Style. HTC U Ultra has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM.
Moto X Style and HTC U Ultra count with really similar displays, both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, the same screen density and a display of the same size. The Moto X Style captures a little bit better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse image and video quality and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto X Style also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra's battery duration is very similar to Motorola Moto X Style's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.