Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is just a bit better than Moto X Style, having a general score of 77.6 against 74.1. The HTC U11 design is newer, much thinner and just a bit lighter than Moto X Style. HTC U11 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the HTC U11 also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
The HTC U11 and Moto X Style feature similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The HTC U11 has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
HTC U11 has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Moto X Style one. The Moto X Style features a bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto X Style also counts with a way better resolution camera and a larger camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.