Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 EYEs is a little bit better than the Moto X Style, getting a global score of 76.9 against 74.1. HTC U11 EYEs's construction is notably newer and extremely thinner, but also a bit heavier than Moto X Style. Motorola Moto X Style counts with a bit sharper display than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
HTC U11 EYEs features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the HTC U11 EYEs also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The HTC U11 EYEs features just a little better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U11 EYEs counts with superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has 3930mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola Moto X Style features a little bit better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.