Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is better than the Motorola Moto X Style, getting an 82.7 score against 74.1. The LG G8X ThinQ is a much newer and way thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto X Style, although it's also just a little heavier. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto X Style has a slightly better display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ has much more memory for apps and games than Moto X Style, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Moto X Style shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with superior battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.