Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is much better than the Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 score. The LG K92 body is extremely newer and notably thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style's, but it's also heavier. Motorola Moto X Style counts with a little bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG K92 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The LG K92 has a better camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a back camera with a way better resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The LG K92 features greater battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.