Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style, with a 76.7 score against 74.1. LG Stylo 6 is a newer and incredibly thinner device than Motorola Moto X Style, although it's somewhat heavier. Moto X Style counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
LG Stylo 6 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 has a little better processing power than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The LG Stylo 6 has improved battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Moto X Style shoots better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a lot more MP camera in the back and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.