Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Style, getting a score of 81.3 against 74.1. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is way newer, a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto X Style. The LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a little larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery life than Moto X Style, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Moto X Style captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto X Style also counts with a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.