Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than the Moto X Style, getting a score of 81.2 against 74.1. The LG V40 ThinQ is a a lot newer phone, and it's also noticeably thinner and just a little lighter than the Moto X Style. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a bit bigger display. The LG V40 ThinQ has a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Moto X Style captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger sensor and a camera with lot more mega-pixels. The LG V40 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.