Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is much better than Moto X Style's general score of 74.1. The LG Wing construction is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than the Moto X Style's, although it is also extremely heavier. LG Wing features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more RAM and 2 more cores.
Moto X Style features a little more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG Wing has a superior camera than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also has better video frame rate, a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and a back camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
LG Wing counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. LG Wing counts with superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.