Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than Moto X Style, getting an 85.3 score against 74.1. Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is heavier than Moto X Style, it's way thinner and incredibly newer. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a slightly better looking display than Moto X Style, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a really larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Moto X Style, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. Motorola Moto X Style counts with a bit better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a lot better 21 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little bit better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 4449mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.