Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto X Style, having a overall score of 87.1 against 74.1. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite body is much newer and incredibly thinner than Motorola Moto X Style's, but it is a bit heavier. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a bit superior CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto X Style has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots much better photos and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and better video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.