Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's design is much newer and notably thinner than Moto X Style's, although it is also just a bit heavier. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little bit better screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Moto X Style features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Moto X Style, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much better resolution back facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.