Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto X Style, with a general score of 77.2 against 74.1. The Motorola Edge 40 body is notably newer, just a little bit lighter and much thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style. Moto X Style features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Motorola Edge 40 has a better camera than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos and a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Motorola Edge 40 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 features a way better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 47 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.