Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is much better than the Motorola Moto X Style, with an 83.4 score against 74.1. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a lot newer and noticeably thinner device than the Motorola Moto X Style, although it's also somewhat heavier. Moto X Style counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 lesser CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little more vivid display than Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.