Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Moto X Style's overall score of 74.1. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is noticeably newer and a lot thinner, but also a bit heavier than Moto X Style. Motorola Moto X Style features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes better videos and photos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, higher video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a much higher resolution camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.