Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Style, with a 76.1 score against 74.1. The Moto G Power construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Moto X Style. The Moto X Style has a little bit better looking screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto G Power features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). Motorola Moto X Style shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Moto G Power features more memory for games and applications than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Power also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power has a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.