Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is better than Moto X Style's score of 74.1. Even though the Motorola Moto G200 5G is somewhat heavier than the Moto X Style, it's notably thinner and also extremely newer. The Moto G200 5G counts with a better CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM.
Moto X Style has a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better display pixels density. The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots better videos and photos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images.
The Moto G200 5G features just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Moto G200 5G has a superior battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.