Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a global score of 76, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 score. The Motorola Moto G8 Power design is noticeably newer and thinner, but a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto X Style. Moto G8 Power features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto X Style features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater display pixel density. The Moto X Style shoots clearer videos and photos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Moto G8 Power has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G8 Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power counts with a way better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.