Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has an overall score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style's general score of 74.1. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a newer phone, and it's also noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better display than Moto X Style, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto X Style has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Moto X Style also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Moto X Style counts with a little longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.