Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 Play has a global score of 76.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style's general score of 74.1. Moto Z3 Play's design is notably newer, lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Moto Z3 Play has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 1 GB more RAM and more 1.8 gigahertz processing cores.
The Motorola Moto X Style features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better pixels amount in each inch of screen. The Moto Z3 Play features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto X Style captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Moto X Style and Moto Z3 Play have really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.