Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 7.2 has an overall score of 75.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. The Nokia 7.2 construction is noticeably newer and thinner than the Moto X Style's, although it's just a little bit heavier. Nokia 7.2 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto X Style features just a bit better display than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Moto X Style shoots slightly better photos and videos than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a camera with lot less megapixels resolution, a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better video resolution.
The Nokia 7.2 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Nokia 7.2 features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 17 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.