Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Polar night |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8.3 5G has a general score of 80.5, which is slightly better than Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. Although the Nokia 8.3 5G is incredibly heavier than the Moto X Style, it's notably thinner and also extremely newer. The Moto X Style has a little bit better screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Moto X Style, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia 8.3 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Moto X Style takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a tinier aperture and a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution, they both have a same size sensor. Nokia 8.3 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.